ALASTAIR STEWART:
Manchester, in the heart of the northwest of England, is tonight host
to a British political first. I'm Alastair Stewart. For the first time on
British television, live in front of a representative studio audience,
we'll be hearing from three men, each hoping to be the leader of the
next UK government in the first election debate.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Good evening, and welcome to the first election debate. Over the
past 50 years, there have been numerous attempts to get the
leaders of the three big political parties to debate with each other
during an election. Tonight, history in the making, as we're joined by
the leader of the Liberal Democrats, Nick Clegg, the Conservative
party leader, David Cameron, and the leader of the Labour Party,
Gordon Brown. This debate will mainly focus on domestic affairs,
important issues that affect our everyday lives. If you want to make
your own comments and follow the debate online, you can do so by
going to ITV.com. In a moment, we'll be taking questions from our
studio audience, but first, let's hear a brief opening statement from
each of the leaders. We'll start with Nick Clegg.
NICK CLEGG:
I believe the way things are is not the way things have to be. You're
going to be told tonight by these two that the only choice you can
make is between two old parties who've been running things for
years. I'm here to persuade you that there is an alternative. I think
we have a fantastic opportunity to do things differently for once. If
we do things differently, we can create the fair society, the fair
country we all want: a fair tax system, better schools, an economy
no longer held hostage by greedy bankers, decent, open politics.
Those are the changes I believe in. I really wouldn't be standing
here tonight if I didn't think they were all possible. So don't let
anyone tell you that the only choice is old politics. We can do
something new; we can do something different this time. That's
what I'm about; that's what the Liberal Democrats offer.
GORDON BROWN:
These are no ordinary times, and this is no ordinary election. We've
just been going through the biggest global financial crisis in our
lives, and we're moving from recession to recovery, and I believe
we're moving on a road to prosperity for all. Now, every promise you
hear from each of us this evening depends on one thing: a strong
economy. And this is the defining year. Get the decisions right now,
and we can have secure jobs, we can have standards of living
rising, and we can have everybody better off. Get the decisions
wrong now, and we could have a double-dip recession. And
because we believe in fairness, as we cut the deficit, over these
next few years, we will protect your police, your National Health
Service, and we will protect your schools. I know what this job
involves; I look forward to putting my plan to you this evening.
DAVID CAMERON:
I think it's great we're having these debates, and I hope they go
some way to restore some of the faith and some of the trust into our
politics, because we badly need that once again in this country. The
expenses saga brought great shame on parliament. I'm extremely
sorry for everything that happened. Your politicians, frankly all of us,
let you down. Now, there is a big choice at this election: we can go
on as we are, or we can say no, Britain can do much better; we can
deal with our debts, we can get our economy growing and avoid this
jobs tax, and we can build a bigger society. But we can only do this
if we recognise we need join together, we need to come together,
we need to recognise we're all in this together. Now, not everything
Labour has done in the last 13 years has been wrong - they've done
some good things and I would keep those, but we need change, and
it's that change I want to help to lead.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Gentlemen, thank you very much indeed. Our first question is from
Gerard Oliver who is a retired toxicologist from Cheshire. Mr Oliver.
AUDIENCE MEMBER: Good evening. What key elements for a fair, workable immigration
policy need to be put in place to actually make it work effectively?
ALASTAIR STEWART: Gordon Brown.
GORDON BROWN: You know, I've heard the concerns around the country. I've been
listening to people. I know people feel there are pressures because
of immigration. That's why we want to control and manage
immigration. And I when I became Prime Minister, I did a number of
things. First, I introduced a points system so no unskilled worker
from outside the European Union can come to Britain now. I also
said that jobs had to be advertised in Jobcentres where there were
skills that there were shortages of that we needed people in this
country. I then said we're going to look at all the range of
occupations where people come from abroad. I talked to a chef the
other day who was training. I said in future, when we do it, there'll
be no chefs allowed in from outside the European Union. Then I
talked to some care assistants - no care assistants come in from
outside the European Union. We are a tolerant, we are a diverse
country, but the controls on migration that I'm introducing and I will
see go further are the right controls, the right policy for Britain.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
David Cameron.
DAVID CAMERON:
Gerard, what I would say is that immigration is simply too high at the
moment. It has been these last ten years, and it does need to come
down. I think the pressures that we've put on housing and health
and education have been too great. If you look at the...what's
happening with immigration, the difference between the amount of
people going to live overseas and those coming here, it's been often
as high as 200,000. That's equivalent to two million across a
decade. It's too much. I want us to bring immigration down so it is in
the tens of thousands, not the hundreds of thousands. How would
we do that? I think we need to have not just a points system, but
also a limit on migration when people are coming from outside the
European Union for economic reasons. I also think when new
countries join the European Union, that actually we should have
transitional controls so they can't all come here at once. It's been
too high these last few years, and I would dearly love to get it down
to the levels it was in the past so it is no longer an issue in our
politics as it wasn't in the past.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Nick Clegg.
NICK CLEGG:
Gerard, you talked about a fair, workable immigration system. That's
exactly what I want. What's happened over the last several years is
almost precisely the reverse. You have had lots and lots of tough
talking about immigration from both Conservative and Labour
governments, and complete chaos in the actual administration of the
system. It was a Conservative government that removed the exit
controls so we knew who was leaving as well as who was coming
in. It's what the Labour government followed up on as well. What I
think we need to do is, firstly, make sure we restore those exit
controls, so we have borders so we know exactly who is coming in
but also when they are supposed to leave. The second thing I would
do is this. At the moment under the immigration system, if you want
to come and work in this country, you have to show two things:
firstly, that you've got a sponsor who is sponsoring your arrival in
this country, and secondly, that there is a job for you to do. I want to
add a third element: that you also only go to a place, to a region,
where you are needed. So that we only send immigrants to those
places where they can be coped.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
You've heard what each has had to say on immigration. It's now
your chance to contest the others' arguments. And you, Gordon
Brown, will start.
GORDON BROWN: Let's be honest with each other, net inward migration is falling. It's
fallen three years ago, two years ago, and it's falling this year. It's
falling as a result of the action we are taking and will continue to
take. To stop illegal migration, which is what Nick has referred to,
border controls have been brought in and we're counting people out
and in from the end of this year. It was a policy the Conservatives
scrapped before 1997. We've got ID cards now for foreign nationals
so an employer can see whether they're legal or illegal. So we're
taking precise and specific action. What I wouldn't do is have an
arbitrary cap. An arbitrary cap means an employer... And I've been
visiting a lot of employers in this region, who wants to bring
someone in from abroad, needs that skilled worker, the skill is not
here, cannot do that. Net inward migration will continue to fall under
our policies. 40,000 less students, I suspect, this year, because of
our tightening of visa controls. Now, these are the things practically
we can do. We're a tolerant country but we want proper control over
migration.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
David Cameron.
DAVID CAMERON:
I think a cap is necessary because we're not going to control
immigration unless we actually take some quite positive and
concrete steps. I think we let down everyone if we don't do this
properly. I was in Plymouth recently, and a 40-year-old black man
made the point to me. He said, "I came here when I was six, I've
served in the Royal Navy for 30 years. I'm incredibly proud of my
country. But I'm so ashamed that we've had this out-of-control
system with people abusing it so badly." If we don't address
immigration properly, we're letting down immigrant communities, as
well as everybody else. So we do need a cap. As well as border
controls that Gordon talks about, and I support strong border
controls, I think we need to go one step further and have a proper
border police force so we combine at our borders, customs,
immigration, security, and police, so we make the most of the fact
that we do have policeable borders, and we can stop more illegal
immigration that way as well.
NICK CLEGG:
The truth is that there is good immigration and there is bad
immigration. I was in a hospital, a paediatric hospital in Cardiff a few
months ago, treating very sick premature young babies. I was being
shown around and there were a large number of babies needing to
be treated. There was a ward standing completely empty, though it
had the latest equipment. I said to the ward sister "What's going on?
Why are there no babies being treated?" She said "New rules mean
we can't employ any doctors from outside the European Union with
the skills needed". That's an example of where the rules are
stopping good immigration which actually helps our public services
to work properly. That's where I want to see, not an arbitrary cap.
We can't just say a cap, what is it? 10, 10,000? A million? What if
you reach the cap in the middle of summer and someone wants to
come and play football for Manchester United or Manchester City?
Do you say they can't come? No, let's have a regional approach
where you only make sure the immigrants who come go to those
regions where they can be supported.
DAVID CAMERON:
On Nick's point, of course we've benefited from immigration for
decades in our country. People have come here to work hard, to
make a contribution, to bring their special skills. We see that in our
health service and schools all the time. But I do think it's got out of
control, and it does need to be brought back under control.
GORDON BROWN:
I don't like these words, because we're bringing it under control. Net
inward migration is falling and will continue to fall as a result of the
measures we've taken. We've brought together the police and the
immigration officials and the customs officials in one agency. We're
doing that already. Illegal immigrants are deterred because we've
got ID cards for foreign nationals now, so an employer cannot say to
someone "You can come and have this job". They've got to ask for
the identity card first. There are big fines if employers break the law.
Now, we've got to do more. That means we've got to tighten the
number of skills we need in this country. That's why we're moving
from care assistants to chefs right through other occupations where
we train up British people to do the skills.
DAVID CAMERON:
A lot of people would ask, though, we've had 13 years of a
government that's now only started to talk about addressing this
issue. If you look at the numbers, net migration levels before 1997
were never greater than 77,000 a year. Under your government,
they've never been less than 140,000 a year. That's a very big
number.
GORDON BROWN:
But you accept the figures are now falling.
DAVID CAMERON:
You're only starting before an election to take the steps that need to
be taken.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
I'm going to bring Nick Clegg in now.
NICK CLEGG:
I think this is partly what's been going wrong for so long. We have
had both major parties running governments over the last 20 years
talking tough about immigration and delivering complete chaos in
the way in which it's run. I'm like anybody else. I just want a fair,
workable immigration system that counts people in, counts people
out, only makes sure immigrants come here if there's jobs for them
to do in parts of the country where they don't place unreasonable
strain on housing, public services and so on. I think the regional
approach that we're putting forward, which would be a major
innovation, they do it in Canada, they do it in Australia, it would be a
major innovation here, which I think would restore public confidence
in an immigration where people feel it's complete chaos.
GORDON BROWN:
You see, I agree with Nick, an arbitrary national cap will not work. I
think the Conservatives are not even giving the number for that cap.
They can't tell us what they will do. Take the controls we're putting
in, add to the points system, restrict more occupations in future
where we can train up people to have the skills. My Britain of vision
moving forward is we train the young people up to get the skills for
the future and we will need less people to come in to meet the skills
shortages of the past. That's now what we're now doing.
DAVID CAMERON:
It's absolutely true that the other side of the coin is proper welfare
reform. We have got too many people who could work, who are
offered work but who don't work. That has actually drawn a lot of
people into our country. We do need to reform welfare. But again,
13 years have gone by when welfare hasn't been properly reformed.
Can I just ask Nick one?
GORDON BROWN:
There are 2.5 million more jobs in this country.
DAVID CAMERON:
Can I just ask Nick one question about this regional approach? I
don't quite understand how you can ask people to come to one part
of the country and rely on them staying in that one country...
NICK CLEGG:
Oh, very easily.
DAVID CAMERON:
You have a vision of the M62 with a border post?
NICK CLEGG:
No, no, no. Very, very easily. They do it in other countries. Basically
it means if you're an employer and you're employing someone
who's got a work permit, then you will need to make sure that in that
work permit, they're only able to work in the region where you are
offering them work. And if you offer them work when they don't have
a work permit which says they're entitled to be in that region, then
you're acting illegally. They do it in other countries, we should do it
here. Because the truth is that our country has lots of different
needs in different parts of the country. That's not being reflected in
the immigration system in which the public has lost any confidence.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Gentlemen, I'm going to leave it there because we have a lot of
questions to get through. You yourselves have said we want to get
some questions. Let's go to the audience and take another. Our
next question is on law and order. I need to point out that it is an
area where powers are devolved to the parliament in Scotland and
from this week, also the assembly in Northern Ireland. This question
comes from optician and mother of two, Jacqueline Salmon.
Jacqueline, your question.
AUDIENCE MEMBER:
Good evening. I was born and still work in Burnley, Lancashire. The
town has the highest burglary rate per head of population in the
entire country. What confidence can you give me that towns such as
this all over the UK can be made safer places to live and work?
DAVID CAMERON:
, the system isn't working properly now, there's no doubt
about it. We're not seeing enough police on the streets, we're not
catching enough burglars, we're not convicting enough. Then we do,
when we do convict them, they're not getting long enough
sentences. I went to Crosby the other day and I was talking to a
woman there who had been burgled by someone who had just left
prison. He stole everything in her house. As he left, he set fire to the
sofa and her son died from the fumes. That burglar, that murderer,
could be out of prison in just four-and-a-half years. The system
doesn't work, but that sort of sentence is, I think, just completely
unacceptable in terms of what the public expect for proper
punishment. What have we got to do? We've got to get rid of the
paperwork and the bureaucracy and we've got to get the police out
on the streets. We need very clear signals from our criminal justice
system: if you cross someone's threshold and rob their home, you
go to prison, and you go to prison for a long time.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Clegg.
NICK CLEGG:
Jacqueline, you asked, what can we do to stop burglary happening
over and over and over and over again. Two things: firstly, quite
simply, more police on our streets. This government wants to waste
billions of your money on an ID card system so you have to pay for
the privilege of having lots of your own details on a piece of plastic
card that you carry around. For pretty well exactly the amount of
money, your money, that the government is pouring into that, we
could put 3,000 more police officers on the streets. That is the
absolute priority for me. The second thing is this: there are too many
young offenders who start first getting into trouble with low-level
nuisance anti-social behaviour who become the hardened criminals
of tomorrow. What we've got to do is stop the young offenders of
today becoming the hardened criminals tomorrow. In my city of
Sheffield, where I'm an MP, we've done some great things to do
exactly that. That's the way to get burglary and crime down.
GORDON BROWN:
Jacqueline, as long as anybody feels unsafe, and as long as
anybody feels insecure, even although crime is falling - official crime
figures show it's falling, and violent crime is falling - I feel that we
have got to do far more. And that's why there's three things I want to
suggest this evening that will make people safer. One is we've got
to have effective policing on the streets. Police have got to spend
80% of their time now on the streets. We've got record police
numbers in this country, and we want to maintain that level of police
force over the next few years. The second thing is, parents have got
to accept responsibility for their children. If an order is passed
against a teenager, then the parent has also got to accept
responsibility, and we're bringing that in now. The third thing I would
say is this: if you are dissatisfied with the way the police are treating
or the police are dealing with your case, and you are persistently
denied the rights you have, then we'll give you the right to take an
injunction against the police so you can be sure that your rights
against anti-social behaviour and crime are upheld.
DAVID CAMERON:
I think one additional point that I would make is if you look at where
so much of the burglary, so much of the car crime is coming from, it
is actually coming from people who are addicted to drugs. I think
we've got to be much faster at getting drug addicts off the streets
and into treatment. And all too often, that doesn't happen. And even
when it does today, they get put on a substitute drug. We're not
really dealing with the problem, which is to get these people to
confront their problems and lead drug-free lives. I even went to a
drug rehab recently in my own constituency, and met a young man
who told me that he committed a certain amount of crimes so he
could get in front of a judge who could then get him a place in a
residential rehab centre.
We must be mad as a country not to get people into that residential
rehab to get them to clean up their lives, so we cut the crime on our
own streets.
NICK CLEGG:
I think, as I say, it's how do we make sure the youngsters of today
don't become the hardened criminals of tomorrow? It's that
conveyor-belt from nuisance at the beginning, anti-social behaviour
in our communities, yobs on on the street corner who then become
the hardened criminals of tomorrow. I think what makes me so
angry is that again, it's like the immigration debate: so much tough
talk from different governments of different parties for so long has
turned our prisons into overcrowded colleges of crime. Do you know
that young men going into prison now on short-term prison
sentences now come out, and nine out of ten of them reoffend, so
we are reproducing more crime than actually cutting it. What I've
seen in my city of Sheffield is that you get these youngsters not
when they've done serious crimes, but when they're first starting to
get into trouble, to face their victims, explain why they've done what
they've done to their victims, apologise for what they've done, make
up for what they've done in the community, cleaning up parks and
streets. It has a dramatic effect on their behaviour. I want to change
people's behaviour before they become the criminals of tomorrow.
GORDON BROWN:
When I was young, my father ran a youth club with my brother for
young people, and the more people who do voluntary service and
give their time in the community to getting young people off the
streets doing purposeful activity, the better, whether it's sports,
dancing or music or other activities that get people off the streets.
But the one thing I'm absolutely sure of - we've got to maintain the
numbers of police we have in this country. We've built up the police
force from a period when it was understaffed to a period where they
now have more police than ever before. I want to make sure that
that continues with neighbourhood policing accountable to you, with
you able to direct what happens in your own local police force. If a
police force is not performing well, let it be taken over by another
police force, so the job is done properly for you. So I would not
support those, and I'm afraid the Conservatives are not prepared to
guarantee, as we are repared to do, that we will continue to fund the
police force and the spending on police will continue to rise so that
we have enough police there on the beat for you.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Mr Clegg, what do you make of what you've heard from the other
two gentlemen?
NICK CLEGG:
Well, it's all very well to stay these things, but if what actually
happens in practice is that we produce, as I say, these colleges of
crime, where we have now, what, about 4,000 people going into our
prisons on short-term prison sentences, they sit around, they learn
some extra tricks of the trade from some more experienced
criminals, and then they go out and nine out of ten of the young men
on short-term prison sentences just commit more crime. I think
that's what Jacqueline is talking about, this desperate, hopeless
feeling. It keeps happening over and over again. I met a young man
in London the other day. His flat had been burgled five times, and
one of them, would you believe it, Jacqueline, was when he was
away at his father's funeral. He said to me "Why can't this stop?"
Unless we do something different, not the same old remedies, but
do something different to stop the youngsters today who are getting
into trouble from becoming the hardened criminals of tomorrow, I
don't this stuff will make the difference that they say it will.
GORDON BROWN:
At Reading Prison, we've been working at this young offenders'
institution with companies, and where people are in this institution,
they've been trained for jobs that they can get if they don't reoffend
and they go out and actually do a decent job. Now, there's been a
75% success in this project, so you can bring the reoffending rate
down. But I do come back to this central problem that we face - I'm
grateful, by the way, David, for you putting up these posters about
me and about crime and about everything else. You know, there's
no newspaper editor done as much for me in the last two years,
because my face is smiling on these posters, and I'm very grateful
to you and Lord Ashcroft for funding that.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
David Cameron.
DAVID CAMERON:
Thank you! Let me take on directly this question of money and
public spending. It will be a common feature through these debates
about how do we fund the public services we need? I think it's really
important that we start focusing on what we get out of the money
that we put in, because if we think that the future is just spending
more and more money, we're profoundly wrong. Hold on...
GORDON BROWN:
The future is not spending more...
ALASTAIR STEWART:
I'll get it going between the two of you, don't worry.
GORDON BROWN:
The issue here is, will you continue to fund the police?
DAVID CAMERON:
Yes, of course. Let me give you an example...
GORDON BROWN:
Will you match our funding on the police? The answer is no from
your manifesto. This is not Question Time.
ALASTAIR STEWART: Let Mr Cameron answer your point.
GORDON BROWN: It's answer time, David.
DAVID CAMERON: What matters is what comes out. I went to a Hull police station the
other day. They had five different police cars, and they were just
about to buy a £73,000 Lexus. There's money that could be saved
to get the police on the frontline. The Metropolitan Police have 400
uniformed officers in their human resources department. Our police
officers should be crime fighters, not form-fillers, and that's what
needs to change.
NICK CLEGG: I'm just slightly surprised that there's any discussion going on
between you about what money you can put into public services,
because I read your manifestos this week. In neither of them are
you coming clean with people about what anything costs, because
you haven't got any figures in your manifestos. We've set out clearly
not only what we will do, but how we will pay for it.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Mr Cameron, on that point?
DAVID CAMERON:
On that point, let me take Nick back to his manifesto and one pledge
that's in there that worried me a lot. My mother was a magistrate in
Newbury for 30 years. She sat on the bench, and she did use those
short prison sentences that you're talking about. I've got to tell you,
when someone smashes up the bus stop, when someone
repeatedly breaks the law, when someone's found fighting on a
Friday or Saturday night, as a magistrate, you've got to have that
power for a short prison sentence when you've tried the other
remedies.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Mr Brown, on that point?
GORDON BROWN:
That's why there are 20,000 more people in prison as a result of the
tougher sentences we've been passing. But you've got to answer
this question: we will continue to match the funding of the police as
of now. You are saying you're going to cut it. Now, be honest with
the public, because you can't airbrush your policies, even though
you can airbrush your posters.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
In one sentence, Mr Cameron?
DAVID CAMERON:
Gordon Brown is trying to make you believe he can protect health
spending, he can protect education spending, he can protect police
spending. He can't do any any of these things, because he's given
this country the biggest budget deficit of any developed country in
the world.
GORDON BROWN:
David, answer the question.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
No, I'm going to stop it there, because I want to get more questions
in. Who knows, that may be an area that we get a question on.
Thank you for that. Now we're going to take another question. Let
me remind you that viewers in Scotland and Wales will be able to
see Scottish and Welsh leaders' debates next Thursday 28th April
at 9 o'clock. Those debates will involve the three parties here
tonight, plus the Scottish National Party and Plaid Cymru in their
respective nations. Our next question is from Helen Elwood, who
runs a pub with her husband. Helen?
AUDIENCE MEMBER:
I own a pub, and people like to chat over a drink. Nothing's
provoked more discussion than MPs' expenses. Given the recent
scandals involving all parties, how are you intending to re-establish
the credibility of MPs in the eyes of the electorate?
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Mr Clegg?
NICK CLEGG:
I don't think that any politician deserves your trust - and you talked
about credibility - deserves any credibility until everybody has come
clean about what has gone wrong. Now, there have been some
changes to the rules and all that, the changes to the expenses rules.
But, you know, there are still people who haven't taken full
responsibility for some of the biggest abuses in the system. There
are MPs who flipped one property to the next, buying property, paid
by you, the taxpayer, and then they would do the properties up, paid
for by you, and pocket the difference in personal profit. They got
away scot-free. There are MPs who avoided paying Capital Gains
Tax. Of course, you remember, what was it, the duck houses and all
the rest of it. But actually, it's the people, the MPs who made these
big abuses, some of them profiting hundreds of thousands of
pounds. I have to stress, not a single Liberal Democrat MP did
either of those things, but they still haven't been dealt with. We can
only turn round the corner on this until we're honest about what
went wrong in the first place.
GORDON BROWN:
I was shocked and I was sickened by what I saw. I'd been brought
up to believe by my parents that you act honestly, and you act fairly
and you act responsibly. As just as the bankers were irresponsible,
so too were members of parliament. Nobody should be standing for
election at this election who is guilty of the offences we've seen in
MPs. I want to do three things to change the system. First of all, I
want to give the right of recall to constituents. If your MP is
misbehaving and is guilty of corrupt practices and parliament
doesn't act, you should have the right to recall that MP. The second
thing we've got to do is give people the right to petition parliament
so that your issues can be raised in parliament and that's what we
propose to do. Thirdly, and this is quite fundamental, and I don't
think David will support us on that, but I hope Nick will, we've got to
reform the House of Commons and the House of Lords. We need a
new House of Commons, a new House of Lords. We will have a
referendum to elect members of parliament with more than 50% of
the vote, and to have a House of Lords that is elected rather than
hereditary or unaccountable. These are the changes we need.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
David Cameron.
DAVID CAMERON:
Helen, I'm not surprised you talk about it in your pub, because it was
just a horrendous episode. As Nick says, it isn't fully finished and
sorted out yet. I know how angry people are in this country. They
pay their taxes and they don't pay their taxes for MPs to abuse the
system. I know how angry I was when I heard about the moats and
the duck houses and the rest of it. I was determined to do my bit to
clean it up, to get my MPs to apologise, to get them to pay back
money, all of which they did before the official reviews started to
happen. But do you know one thing I think we really need to do as
part of the apology, is to say to the British people, we're going to cut
the cost of politics. We're going to cut the size of the House of
Commons by 10%. We're going to cut ministers' pay by 5% and
freeze it for the whole of the parliament. We're going to cut the size
of Whitehall by a third. We're going to get rid of some of these
quangos. We're going to make your politics better value for money
as well as cleaner. I think that's part of the apology we really badly
need to make.
NICK CLEGG:
I have to say to both David Cameron and Gordon Brown, what
bothers me is that I hear the words, they sound great. But, you
know, it's not just what you say, it's what you do. Why is it that when
I put forward, Liberal Democrats put forward, a law which would
have given all of you and everyone watching now the right to sack
their MP if their MP is corrupt, the Labour MPs voted against it, the
Conservative MPs didn't even bother to vote. Why is it when we
supported a deal to clean up the really murky business of party
funding which has affected all parties, you blocked it, you blocked it.
GORDON BROWN:
We supported it.
NICK CLEGG:
You wanted to protect the paymasters of the trade union.
Paymasters, you wanted to protect Lord Ashcroft in his offshore
haven in Belize. It's not good enough to keep talking about how we
need to change politics, if when you've got an opportunity to
change, you actually block it. I think that's a betrayal, I think that's a
con. I think you deserve the right to sack your MPs when they're
corrupt, but you also deserve a politics where we finally get the big
money out of politics altogether.
GORDON BROWN:
You see, I agree with Nick. There's got to be a right of recall for
people who are in a constituency and find their MPs corrupt and
parliament doesn't act. I agree with that. I think Nick also agrees
with me about a new House of Commons and a new House of
Lords, properly accountable, with a new system of election that will
be put to referendum next year. But David's solution, just to cut the
number of MPs. Cut the number of MPs... All of us represent a
constituency of people; all of us represent communities; all of us
represent neighbourhoods and localities which deserve to have their
local representation. I would cut one thing: I would cut the numbers
of the House of Lords, and not by 10%, but by 50%. A smaller
House of Lords, directly accountable, and David, please, no more
hereditary peers.
DAVID CAMERON:
I want to see a reformed House of Lords. I think the House of Lords
should be predominantly elected. Gordon, you have had 13 years to
sort out the House of Lords. If there are still hereditary peers sitting
in the House of Lords, if you're not happy with the House of Lords,
why on earth haven't you done something about it? You have had
all this time. To suddenly now talk about electoral reform, about
changing the voting system which you started doing just weeks
before the general election, I think people will see that as a bit of a
ploy. Let me defend once again this idea of cutting the size of the
House of Commons. Who in business, who in public services, who
in their family life, hasn't actually had to try and get more for less?
Hasn't had to trim their budgets, hasn't had to work a bit harder?
Why on earth should MPs and parliament be any different? We
could quite as well get by with 10% fewer MPs, we could cut the
cost for you, the taxpayer, and we could do a better job at the same
time.
GORDON BROWN:
We'll cut the cost of politics more by halving the House of Lords and
making it a far smaller chamber, making it accountable and making
it democratic. David, let's be honest, you voted against taking action
against removing hereditary peers from the House of Lords. You
don't want to that happen. You blocked it only in the last week. The
key issue here is, will we take responsibility for a better form of
politics?
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Mr Cameron? Mr Cameron?
GORDON BROWN:
Right of recall, right to petition, and a better House of Commons and
Lords.
DAVID CAMERON:
me just make one point after all that Nick said. I thought there
was a slight danger of a sort of holier than thou. We should all be
frank. Politics has been in a mess for all of us - we all had MPs with
dreadful expenses problems. There are still three Labour MPs in
court at the moment. There were Liberal MPs that were criticised.
When it comes to party funding, yes, there's been the union money
going into Labour from the Unite union. Yes, the Conservative Party
has been too reliant for too long on rich individuals, and yes, the
Liberal Democrats took £2.5 million off someone who's still, I think,
a criminal on the run and the money hasn't been paid back. Let's not
get too holier than thou over all this.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Nick Clegg?
NICK CLEGG:
Hang on a minute. Before we bandy about these things, let's be
absolutely clear. We were completely exonerated for that, it was
years ago. I'm talking about what's been going on now.
DAVID CAMERON:
Have you paid the money back?
NICK CLEGG:
Listen, none of this will make any difference if we allow this rotten
system in Westminster to carry on where MPs have jobs for life,
where they basically only need to get 20, 30% of your votes in their
areas, then no questions asked, they don't even need to bother until
the next time there's an election. There is a direct correlation
between the hundreds of Labour and Conservative MPs who have
got these safe seats, these jobs for life, and the levels of abuse in
expenses.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Gordon Brown.
NICK CLEGG:
Neither of you want to clean up the system from top to toe in the
way that...
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Thank you, Mr Clegg. Mr Brown.
GORDON BROWN: I honestly think we should raise the standard of debate here.
There's been awful things that have happened. We have had to take
action against lots of MPs who have betrayed the public trust. We
are in politics I hope for serving the public, not serving ourselves.
But we've got to take action that makes a real difference in the
future. Now, Nick supports me in reforming the House of Commons
and the House of Lords. I think the Conservatives should support us
as well.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Mr Clegg, can you clarify that? Can you clarify that assertion?
NICK CLEGG:
There was absolutely nothing to support. They did nothing for 13
years.
GORDON BROWN:
You support...
NICK CLEGG:
No. I mean...
GORDON BROWN:
Do you support the alternative vote system in the House of
Commons?
NICK CLEGG:
What I support is something I've supported all my adult political life,
which is a complete clean-up from top to toe of politics. Direct
elections to the House of Lords. They shouldn't be there just
because they've done favours to politicians making the rules that
you need to abide by...
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Mr Brown.
NICK CLEGG:
..getting big money out, fair votes for everybody.
GORDON BROWN:
The truth is that Nick does support fundamental reform of the House
of Commons...
NICK CLEGG:
But you haven't offered it.
GORDON BROWN:
We're going to put it to a referendum next year and let the people
decide. When politics breaks down in the way it did, and we had
corrupt MPs, then we've got to have a new start, a referendum next
year on a new House of Commons, and a new House of Lords.
That's the way forward. I'm sorry that the Conservatives reject these
reforms.
DAVID CAMERON: Well, it's rather difficult, because Gordon says Nick agrees with
Gordon and Nick says Nick doesn't agree with Gordon. Let me try
and find something we're all agreed on that we could change, it
would make a difference. I think it is time that when an MP breaks
the rules, that those constituents should be able to throw that
member of parliament out of parliament without having to wait for a
general election. I think we all agree about that...
GORDON BROWN:
I've just said that.
DAVID CAMERON: ..and whoever wins the next election, we can put that in place
straightaway.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Let me clarify precisely that assertion. The claim is that we are all
agreed upon that point. Mr Brown?
GORDON BROWN:
The right of recall, yes. But I want a more fundamental reform. I
want an MP to be elected with more than 50% of the vote, and I
want a House of Lords that is not hereditary but elected on a
proportional representation list system. That's what we want to put
to a referendum next year.
NICK CLEGG:
I'm absolutely dismayed by this. This is something I actually put
forward in the House of Commons. We already could have had that
law, people already could have had the right to sack corrupt MPs.
Labour MPs voted against it. Conservative MPs didn't turn up.
GORDON BROWN:
I'm in favour of it.
NICK CLEGG:
It's great we're saying the same thing. You've also got to do the right
thing to clean up politics.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Gentlemen, thank you very much indeed on that question. Thank
you
very much. Now, let me just correct something I said earlier on, heat
of the moment, sorry, I do apologise for that. The Scottish and
Welsh leaders' debates are on Tuesday of next week, not on
Thursday. My apologies for that. Our next question is on education,
an area where again there are devolved powers in Scotland, Wales
and Northern Ireland, OK? Now, Joel Weiner is a 17-year-old
secondary school student from London. Joel, your question?
AUDIENCE MEMBER:
I'm in my final year of school. I found that the system is incredibly
grades-driven, so much so, that often education for its own sake is
at sacrifice. We are over -examined and under-taught. What will the
party leaders do to improve education?
GORDON BROWN:
I want to see our education improve as it has done over the last few
years. We need teachers with better qualifications. We need young
people with the aspiration to succeed, and we need to give people
the chance to start education early, that's why nursery education
starts at three and be able to go through to 18. That's what we are
saying in our manifesto, education will be part-time or full-time till
the age of 18. As far as grades and standards are concerned, I
myself believe in the highest of standards. I believe if we don't
search for the highest of standards, then we will not in the end get
the best pupils coming out of our schools. Yes, we've got to look at
the different types of exams and we will do so. But I think it's
important to realise we're in this new world where we are competing
with Asia, as well as America and Europe and our young people
have got to have the grades, the qualifications to be able to meet
the best in the world. That's what I want to achieve and I hope I can
work with you to do so.
DAVID CAMERON:
have every sympathy with what you say because education is
important, that, as well as getting good grades that actually we're
opening young people's minds to all the best things that have been
written and all the best things that have been said and to really
excite people about education. I think there is a danger that our
education system has become terribly bureaucratic. We send 4,000
pages of information to schools every year. We spend £300 million
on educational quangos. We're not getting enough to the frontline,
following the child into the school. As someone who has got two
children, one of whom started at a state school in London, and
hopefully another child to come, I'm passionate about getting as
much money into the school as possible, rather than wasting it in
Whitehall. In terms of exams, we've got to have good external
marking, done properly, and high standards. I think that's absolutely
key. I wouldn't want to see that change. But let's set the schools
free, so we trust in the vocation of the teachers who do what they
want - they're there because they have a vocation they care about.
NICK CLEGG:
, I think everyone will recognise what you're talking about, this
feeling that you have to constantly jump through hoops. The
symptoms are everywhere. Our National Curriculum is 600 pages.
The curriculum in Sweden, which has generally got a fairly good
education system, is 16 pages. I just read the other day that head
teachers now by e-mail over the last year, have received - get this -
4,000 pages of instructions from on high from Whitehall. This is
crazy. We've got to let head teachers teach, we've got to let
teachers teach. We've got to reinstil a sense of enthusiasm and
creativity in the way that you are taught. That's why we want to do,
the Liberal Democrats, is to put on to the statute book an Education
Freedom Act which literally bans government from micromanaging
what happens every minute of the day with every single test in every
classroom in the country. That's what I'd like to see. I think it would
make a big difference to you and other people who are at school.
GORDON BROWN: But every school has got to be a good school. We've got to insist on
the highest standards for every school. Since 1997, 1,600
underperforming secondary schools in 1997 went down to 250. Next
year, down to zero, as a result of the fact that we're allowing
federations, academies, to take over underperforming schools.
That's the way forward, to insist on the highest standards, to make
sure an underperforming school is taken over, to make sure we
invest enough in the education system to ensure our children are
properly taught. What I'd be very worried about is if in this difficult
and straitened time, we were to cut our budgets for education at this
point in time. I think that would put our children at risk for the future,
and it's very important that we continue to invest in the education of
every child in this country.
DAVID CAMERON:
What I'd say in terms of what I care about most in education with my
own children going through the system, I want what every parent in
this country wants, and it starts with something that actually doesn't
necessarily cost money, and that is good discipline in our schools.
In a typical year now, you get 17,000 teachers being attacked by
students. We've got a real problem here. There was a case in
Manchester once where a child produced a knife in a school, got
excluded, and then the appeals panel put that child back into the
school. Imagine what that does to the head teacher that's trying to
keep order. So we say head teachers should be able to exclude
difficult pupils and not be overruled by appeals panels. We say
you've got to change the rules so teachers can keep order in class.
Right now, we seem to be treating the teacher like children and the
children like the adults. We've got it topsy-turvy, the wrong way
round, and we really need to change that so that we have proper
discipline and order. Then people can learn.
NICK CLEGG:
I think discipline is important, of course. I think creativity, which I
think is the point you're saying, Joel - I'm not allowed to ask you
questions, that's against the rules, but just nod if - good! I think
creativity is important in the classroom, and think freedom for
teachers and head teachers. One thing which I think would really
help in all of those things - discipline, creativity, freedom for
teachers - is quite simply good old-fashioned smaller class sizes.
We have 8,000 infants in this country now between the ages of five
and seven who are in classes which are so big, they're illegal,
technically illegal. It's just logical. If you're a teacher, friends of mine
who are teachers say they can't really keep an eye on the
troublemakers, but they also can't support the brightest children if
the classes are huge. That's why we've got a plan, fully costed, to
provide schools with additional resources so that they can bring
down the average class size in a primary school, for instance down
to 20, and the average class size in a secondary school down to 16.
DAVID CAMERON:
, we mustn't confuse what goes in in terms of money with what
comes out. I spoke about the fact that we spend £300 million on
educational quangos. The Department of Children, Schools and
Families - a lot of teachers actually call it the Department of Curtains
and Soft Furnishings because it's so beautifully done up - they
recently spent £3 million improving their own building, and putting in
a - I'm not making this up - a contemplation suite and a massage
room. As a parent of children at state schools, I want every available
penny to go with the child into the school so the teacher can actually
provide great education for our children. There is a lot of waste, and
it needs to be cut.
GORDON BROWN:
Creativity, discipline, standards in schools, but we can't evade this
question: if we're going to have the best education for our children,
we do need the teachers and the teaching assistants. If you cut
money out of the education budget now, you'll be cutting the
numbers of teachers and teaching assistants. We say it's so
important for our country that while we cut the deficit, we will
maintain our investment in education per pupil. Now, the
Conservatives cannot say this, and I think we need an answer this
evening. Again, it's the risk, the risk to our health service, the risk in
crime if you have less police. Now it's the risk to education.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Cameron.
DAVID CAMERON:
Gordon Brown isn't telling you is that he's putting up National
Insurance contributions on every single job in 2011. The biggest
cost schools have is teachers. So he's going to be taking money out
of every single school in the country, primary school, secondary
school, FE college. We say stop the waste in government now so
we can stop the lion's share of that National Insurance increase and
jobs tax next year. That's the best way to make sure we keep the
money going into the school.
GORDON BROWN:
But be honest about the risk. You're going to take one billion at least
out of the schools this year.
DAVID CAMERON:
It's simply not true.
GORDON BROWN:
If you were elected, in a budget in July, you've got to take six billion
out of the system, other than health and defence. Where does that
money come from? You've promised you'll take six billion out. It can
only end up with the loss of thousands of jobs, including teachers.
You will not back us and support us on keeping education. Why
won't you support educational spending, as we do?
DAVID CAMERON:
I think people can hear that this is a complete invention of a figure
plucked out of the air. We're saying the government could save one
pound out of every hundred it spends. Now, what small business,
what large business, what family, frankly, hasn't had to do that
during this difficult recession?
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Mr Clegg now.
GORDON BROWN:
You're going to take money out of the school system.
NICK CLEGG:
I'm not sure if you're like me, but the more they attack each other,
the more they sound exactly the same. Look, Joel's question - let's
go back to the question. Joel asked, why are you being tested so
much? How can all pupils in our schools feel they're being
supported and getting the best out of education? I come back to this
need to combine two things: firstly, more freedom for teachers and
head teachers. Remember this crazy thing I told you about head
teachers getting 4,000 pages of instructions by e-mail, and
secondly, smaller class sizes, more one-to-one tuition, Saturday
morning classes, evening classes, so that you can help those
children in particular who perhaps aren't being supported at home
as much as anybody else. I know from my two sons, who go to an
excellent local state-funded school in my area, if a whole class can
move together, then that enriches all children. I think what goes
wrong is when classes get so big and classes actually fall apart.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Brown.
GORDON BROWN:
We've got to be clear about this. I, too, want freedom for schools,
and that's why where a school is failing, it will be taken over by a
federation or an academy so that it can work, usually a local
federation or a local academy. I want the best discipline in our
schools as well, and I'm tough on what head teachers have got to
do to ensure there's discipline not just in the school itself, but
around the school as well, but we've got to face up to the fact about
spending.
NICK CLEGG:
, Gordon Brown mentioned spending - absolutely, too right. I
don't think we're really going to get those smaller class sizes, that
one-to-one tuition that I think Joel agrees is necessary, the catch-up
classes, unless we find the money from savings elsewhere. We've
spelt that out in our manifesto, so we can provide under our plan
£2.5 billion extra to our schools.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
I'm going to stop you right there, because I know what the questions
are and you don't, but the next question continues that debate. Your
answers are entirely a matter for you, and your rebuttals as well, but
I think you may find that the next question will continue that
discussion. It's Robert Lewis, a senior manager in healthcare. Mr
Lewis, your question.
AUDIENCE MEMBER:
How certain can you be that your party's policies will deal with the
budget deficits without damaging economic growth?
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Mr Cameron?
DAVID CAMERON:
This is an absolutely vital question, and I'm glad it's been asked,
because we've got to get this economy moving. We've got to get
this economy growing. What we say is save £6 billion in the coming
current year in order to stop the jobs tax which we think will derail
the recovery. Because if you put a tax on jobs, that I think is a jobs
killer, it is a recovery killer, it's an economy killer. A hundred of the
leading business people in this country, people who run companies
like Sainsbury's, Marks & Spencers and Mothercare have all said
that the threat to recovery is not cutting out waste as we say, the
threat to recovery is Labour's proposal for a jobs tax. So I think
we've got to remove this dark cloud of a deficit over our economy
and it makes sense to make a start on that now. Make a start this
year, to avoid the tax next year, and then we can go forward with
further plans to remove our deficit and our debt that will hold our
country back if we're not careful.
NICK CLEGG:
Where are you, Robert? I can hear your voice, but... Ah, there you
are, right at the back. Sorry. Behind the camera. Now I can see you.
Robert, I think we need to just be open with you, straight with you,
and we've sought to do that. We've specified - I think we're the only
party in politics now, in our manifesto, look at the back of our
manifesto, which says, here are the figures, this is the way that we
would find cuts and savings of £15 million. How would we do that?
By things like removing tax credits for the top 20% of recipients of
tax credits, ending the child trust fund, which gives £250 to all 18-
year-olds. I'd love to give everybody £250 but I don't think we can
afford it right now. Putting a cap of £400 on any pay increases in the
public sector for the next two years. But also some long-term
choices. I'm the only leader here who is saying very clearly I don't
think we can either justify or afford the like-for-like replacement of
the Cold War nuclear missile system, the Trident missile system,
over the next 25 years. It will cost you, all of us, £100 billion. We
can't afford it.
GORDON BROWN:
We've been through a terrible financial recession - a global financial
recession - and every time we have had to make big choices about
what we do. To support the economy when there was no private
investment happening; to support people who were unemployed so
we could keep unemployment down; to support mortgages so there
were no mortgage repossessions like the 1990s. Now, we're at a
critical point in our economy now. I will be honest with you, you
cannot afford to take money out of the economy now because you
will put jobs at risk, businesses at risk, and you put the whole
recovery at risk. £6 billion out of the economy means lost jobs, it
means lost businesses, it means lost growth. If you take that money
out now, I fear for what could happen, and we do not want to have a
double-dip recession in this country. Take £6 billion out and it is the
equivalent of taking out thousands of jobs in this economy today
and making a lot of jobs that are safe at the moment unsafe. I would
not recommend that at all.
DAVID CAMERON:
Let me take on, Robert, this argument directly, the idea that if you
cut waste this year, you endanger the recovery. Just this week,
we've seen two I think pretty hideous waste stories. The first is that
civil servants have been given credit cards funded by the tax-payer
to go out and spend that on food, wine and other things, and that's
cost £1 billion. The second story was that managers in the National
Health Service, many of whom are paid over £250,000, have had a
7% pay rise. Are we honestly saying that if you didn't have that sort
of waste, that sort of excess, that our economy would collapse? I
think it's nonsense. It's like saying that giving up smoking is
somehow going to be bad for your health. Giving up waste would be
good for our economy, and it would mean that we could stop this tax
rise that's coming down the track, that Britain's biggest business
leaders all say will cost jobs. Cut the waste, stop the tax. That's the
right answer.
NICK CLEGG:
These two constantly argue about waste as if we can create...or we
can fill the black hole in public finances by saving money on paper
clips and pot plants in Whitehall. Of course we can get rid of a bit of
waste. But that isn't the big... That doesn't really address the big
questions we need to ask ourselves. I think we need to be clear with
you, open with you, straight with you. We've tried to do that. We've
set out £15 billion worth of savings. I've listed some of them. We
have one specific tax that we want to introduce to help fill the black
hole. We would impose a 10% tax on the profits of the banks, these
banks who have got us into the trouble in the first place. I think they
should pay you back because you, the taxpayer, have bailed them
out, and use that money to deal with the black hole in the finances.
Let's not get obsessed about mythical savings and waste, which is
the oldest trick in the book, to pretend that you can square a circle
like that. Or get obsessed about when you deliver these cuts. The
crucial thing is, are we going to be open with people, with you, about
how we're going to save money in the long-term?
GORDON BROWN:
Just think how difficult it is to save 50,000, 100,000, 200,000, a
million, and then think of 6,000 million to be saved in the next nine
months before the end of the financial year. I fear for our economy if
that happens. The only way we've kept our economy moving
forward is not because there's been private investment or bank
lending, it's because the government has had to step in to make
sure there is sufficient growth. We've prevented unemployment
going to the levels of America and Europe. I say you've got to keep
that support now. Every other European country, America, agrees
with that. Only the Conservative Party is against keeping that
support in the economy now. Now, of course we've got to deal with
waste, but if you take the waste out, you put more money into the
economy to make sure the economy can continue to grow. It's the
only way we can save jobs and businesses in this country now. I
say to the whole audience here and to the nation: it is important at
this moment to take no risk with the recovery. Once again, the
Conservatives are showing they are a risk to the recovery in this
country.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Nick Clegg.
NICK CLEGG:
We all know we've got this great black hole in our public finances.
That's obvious. We all know we're going to have to save money; we
all know we're going to have to make cuts. The question at this
election is who is trying to be straight with you about the scale of
those cuts, how long they'll take? As it happens, this is one area
where I would like for once to see politicians put people before
politics. What I'm suggesting - I don't know whether Gordon Brown
and David Cameron will take up this invitation - is that regardless of
the outcome of the general election, that we get the Chancellor and
the shadow Chancellors together, the governor of the Bank of
England, the head of the Financial Services Authority, to come
clean with you about how big this structural deficit is. It's estimated
to be somewhere around £70 billion. And straight with you, finally,
about how long it is going to take to fill that.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
David Cameron.
DAVID CAMERON:
There's no doubt the country's going to have to come together to
deal with this really big problem of the deficit. For every £4 that we
spend right now, the government is borrowing one of those pounds.
Nick keeps saying he's being very straight with you. In his manifesto
is a promise for a £17 billion tax cut. It is a great idea. I'd love to do
it but we don't have £17 billion for a tax cut. Gordon is saying...
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Nick Clegg on that specific point.
NICK CLEGG:
We've spelt out exactly where that money would come from. We
would, for instance, stop this grotesque spectacle of this unfair tax
system which has been built up under a succession of Labour and
Conservative governments, where right now, a greedy banker in the
City of London pays a lower rate of tax on their capital gains than
their cleaner does on their wages. We have a tax system...
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Gordon Brown. Gordon Brown.
GORDON BROWN:
Back to the question Robert put, that the PCT, the health authority,
was finding it very difficult because of the situation at the moment.
Take thousands of millions out of the economy now, take £6 billion
out of the economy now, and think of the risk to jobs and
businesses. I say to the Conservatives, of course we want efficiency
savings and of course we want to deal with waste, but we cannot
afford to see private investment so small and then public investment
cut at this time and lots of jobs put at risk.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
David Cameron.
GORDON BROWN: Please tell us you won't do that.
DAVID CAMERON:
£6 billion is one out of every £100 the government spends. What
small business in this recession, what big business hasn't had to
make that sort of decision? Many people are making a much bigger
decision. Turn it round the other way and think about it like this.
Gordon is effectively saying, "I want to go on wasting money now so
I put up your taxes later." Why should we pay our taxes for
government waste?
GORDON BROWN:
We've got a responsibility for the overall growth rate of the
economy. We've got to get this economy moving forward. You can't
do it with private investment alone. The government has got to play
its role. Now, next year, we'll make these bigger savings and of
course we're going to pay for health and for education, and for
policing by what we do on National Insurance. But this year, don't
pull the money out of the economy, don't put good people's jobs and
their businesses at risk now.
DAVID CAMERON:
But why do you think it is, I would say, that a hundred of the leading
business people in this country, people who run some of the biggest
businesses like Corus, like Logica, like Mothercare, why do they
say, and they couldn't be more clear, the risk to the economy isn't
cutting waste, the risk to the economy is Labour's proposal of a jobs
tax.
ALASTAIR STEWART: Gordon Brown on that specific point.
GORDON BROWN: The risk to the economy is this year, and every country - America,
the rest of Europe, including Britain - is saying, we've got to make
sure we invest in the economy this year so that we can have the
growth we need. Now, pull out the money, and you've proposed it at
every point during this recession, pull out the money and you'll have
less growth, you'll have less jobs, and you'll have less businesses.
That's the fear. We've got to take an overall responsibility for the
whole economy.
NICK CLEGG: All I would say is this argument I think just doesn't address the
fundamental issue. There are going to be big things over the next
few years, and neither will come clean on this with you, that we
simply can't afford to do. Trident, I don't think we can afford it. A tax
on banks I think is now unavoidable. Tax credits. We need to look at
public sector pensions. These are big decisions we need to take.
ALASTAIR STEWART: David Cameron?
NICK CLEGG: I would like us for once to get politicians together...
ALASTAIR STEWART: Yeah. I've got the agenda, Mr Clegg. Mr Cameron's response.
DAVID CAMERON: I just want to make this... I think people at home watching will find it
extraordinary that Gordon Brown is really saying, you've got to go
on wasting money to keep the economy going. Why not cut the
waste and stop the tax rise? It can't be in... How is a 7% pay rise for
NHS managers essential for economic growth?
ALASTAIR STEWART: I'm going to have to park it there...
GORDON BROWN: We made 35 billion of...
ALASTAIR STEWART: No, I'm going to stop you because we had some of this in the
previous question and I've still got more questions that I really want
to take. A lot of information there for people to reflect on. I do want
to move it on. Our next questioner comes from an army family and
himself has served in the Territorial Army. Nick Brimson, your
question.
AUDIENCE MEMBER: Good evening, guys. British troops seem to be dying unnecessarily
and far too frequently. In my opinion, they are under-equipped and
massively underpaid. What assurances can you give the armed
forces that things will improve?
ALASTAIR STEWART: Mr Clegg?
NICK CLEGG: You're right, Nick. They are under-equipped and they are underpaid.
I think there's something seriously wrong when you've got 8,000
bureaucrats in the Ministry of Defence who work on
communications. When we have too many top brass in some of the
services - there are, I think, two admirals for every warship. We
have 17 brigadiers for every brigade. And we also, of course, have
this consensus from the Conservative and Labour Parties that we
should spend £100 million renewing the Cold War nuclear Trident
missile system. I say if we change our priorities, we can provide our
brave servicemen and servicewomen, who do the most astonishing
job in the most extraordinarily difficult circumstances, we can give
them proper pay. I think it's a scandal that someone who starts in
the army on a junior rank now gets paid £6,000 less than someone
starting as a firefighter or in the police service. I want them to have
the same pay, and I also want them to have proper body amour,
proper helicopters, proper vehicles. You can only do that if you cut
out spending elsewhere which isn't being well spent.
GORDON BROWN: Let me say, first of all, my pride and my admiration for the armed
forces, and our questioner who was in the Territorial Army, all those
who serve our nation, and particularly at this time when we're at war
in Afghanistan, we've got to remember and we've got to do our best
not just by the armed forces but by their families. And let us
remember all those who lost their lives in Afghanistan. The
important thing is that we're doing the right thing by our troops. And
that's why we've increased the spending on equipment dramatically
over these last few years. A thousand new vehicles, new helicopters
brought into Afghanistan. We used to spend £600 million on
Afghanistan three or four years ago. It is now 5,000 million this year.
Now, this... Every time, you know, I've got to write to a family where
someone's died, I've got to consider all these issues. I would not
send our troops into battle unless I was absolutely sure that they
were properly equipped for what they're doing.
DAVID CAMERON: Sorry, I couldn't see Nick in the audience. Can you put your hand
up? Ah... Oh, sorry, you're behind the... Same problem, behind the
camera. First of all, can I thank you for what you do, and I join with
Gordon in paying tribute to our forces. I've been to Afghanistan in
each of the last four years, and just the bravery and the incredible
courage and determination of what those men and women do just
humbles you every time you see it. They're not just brave fighters,
they are brilliant diplomats in dealing with difficult situations, they're
incredible athletes, they are brilliant, brilliant people. But I don't think
we do do enough for them. I know that steps are being taken to try
and improve the situation. But, frankly, we shouldn't be in the
situation we are. In the last few months, we had to fight a battle in
parliament to stop the government cutting the training for the
Territorial Army. I think it's madness when you've got soldiers
deployed overseas actually not to invest in your Territorial Army,
because they're a very, very important part of our armed services.
NICK CLEGG: I think it's also what kind of equipment we provide. I was in a factory
in my own city where I'm an MP in Sheffield just a few weeks ago.
There was a great British company there, a manufacturing
company, that produces great metal braces with these huge rollers,
which apparently are sold to the American army. They attach them
onto their vehicles, and when the rollers move over mines, the
mines blow up, but of course, they destroy the rollers and not the
soldiers. The American army says that those rollers, diesigned,
manufactured by a great British business in Sheffield, have saved
140 lives. Why is it they're not being used by the British army?
Apparently they don't somehow fit on to the vehicles that our
soldiers use. So I think it's not only that we've got to make sure that
we don't waste money on bureaucrats in the Ministry of Defence
and all the rest of it, and instead spend that on equipment for our
brave servicemen and servicewomen, we should also use the knowhow
and the manufacturing brilliance expertise in this country to
provide our brave soldiers with the equipment which saves lives on
the front line.
GORDON BROWN: Every urgent operational requirement that our armed forces have
asked us for has been met. I've got two big questions I've got to
answer to the British people for: why are we in Afghanistan? We're
in Afghanistan because there is a terror threat and a chain of terror
that comes from the Afghan-Pakistan border to our country, and
three-quarters of the terrorist plots that we identify start not in
Britain, start not in Europe, but start in that border area. The second
question I've got to answer is how we can get our troops home.
Because that is what we all want to see at the end of the day. We've
got to build up the Afghan army, build up the police force in
Afghanistan. Our brave troops are helping to train the Afghan army
and police at the moment, and that's how we will gradually see the
numbers of Afghan forces rise and our troops come down in number
so that our troops can come home. As we do that, we've got to
ensure that pay continues to rise for our troops, and those people
who leave the forces have got to get proper protection - homes,
health service and of course, the chance of jobs.
DAVID CAMERON: We all want to see those things happen, and I think it's an
absolutely vital year we're having in Afghanistan. And you can see, I
hope, progress being made but difficult, difficult times lie ahead.
There is something more fundamental we need to do in order to
answer your question properly. That is we've got to have a
fundamental defence review of all that we spend and all that we do
and all the equipment that we have. Because if you think about it,
over the last decade, since we last did this, we have had 9/11, we
have had 7/7 in our own country, we have had the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan, and yet we fundamentally haven't asked again, what
should be the shape of our army, our navy, our air force? How can
we best defend our country? How can we best protect our
servicemen and women? We need urgently to do that. We make
sure if we get involved in these conflicts in the future, we don't have
the situation where we have had troops on the ground without
enough helicopters. We all know that happened after 2006 and it
really wasn't good enough.
GORDON BROWN: No, what happened after 2006 is that the Taliban changed its
tactics. Before they were in a one-to-one confrontation with us faceto-
face. They couldn't win that armed battle, so they took to
explosive devices, guerrilla warfare. And we had to respond to that
as all our allies had to do. We have 1,000 new vehicles in
Afghanistan as a result of the decisions to get Mastiffs and
Ridgebacks and other vehicles into the frontline. And we've also got
more helicopters as a result of what we've done.
NICK CLEGG: I actually agree, strongly agree, and it's something I've been calling
for for years, that we should have a complete review about whether
our military equipment is right for the job that we are asking our
brave soldiers and brave servicemen and women to do. Because of
course the world is changing and the threats to this country are
changing with it. What I simply don't understand is if we hold that
review, as I think is going to be likely after the general election,
whoever wins that election, both David Cameron and Gordon Brown
want to rule out one of the biggest items of defence expenditure of
all, which is the Trident nuclear missile system. This was a system
that was designed at the height of the Cold War to flatten St
Petersburg and Moscow. Is it really that important?
ALASTAIR STEWART: Let me bring David Cameron in on that point.
DAVID CAMERON: Let me answer that directly because I think it's important. I think the
most important duty of any government, anyone who wants to be
Prime Minister of this country, is to protect and defend our United
Kingdom. And are we really happy to say that we'd give up our
independent nuclear deterrent when we don't know what is going to
happen with Iran, we can't be certain of the future in China, we don't
know exactly what our world will look like? I say we should always
have the ultimate protection of our independent nuclear deterrent.
That's why we voted to make sure that happened.
ALASTAIR STEWART: Gordon Brown.
GORDON BROWN: I've got to deal negotiations over Iran, and we've got the problem
over North Korea. If countries unilaterally decide to have nuclear
weapons and break the Non-Proliferation Treaty, then we need
multi-lateral action with all of us working together. We are nuclear
weapon states. We can make a huge difference in the reduction of
nuclear weapons overall, if we can persuade countries not to have
nuclear weapons in the first place or force them not to have them, if
we can then have a reduction in nuclear weapons all round. But I
don't favour Nick's proposal which would unilaterally abandon our
nuclear deterrent when we know Iran and North Korea and other
countries are trying to get...
NICK CLEGG: All I'm saying is, I don't think we should kid people into thinking we
can either justify or afford £100 billion over 25 years on a nuclear
war system...missile system, which was designed explicitly to flatten
St Petersburg and Moscow at the press of a button. I think the world
has moved on amd I think you two need to move with it. We're not in
the Cold War any more, and we shouldn't be spending billions of
pounds of taxpayers' money on a Cold War missile system when, as
Nick said in his original question, we have people on the frontline of
Afghanistan without the right equipment and without the right
protection. It's a question of priorities.
ALASTAIR STEWART: Mr Cameron, on that context of priorities, a little more clarification.
I'd like to put it to the three of you that we've dealt with that nuclear
question. More on priorities, as the questioner put it.
DAVID CAMERON: We need the defence review, so we can get everything required for
the frontline. I just want to go back to what I think Gordon didn't
really tell you, which is, after we deployed in Afghanistan at the end
of 2005, for several years, I went each year, and each year, you
didn't have to talk to many of our servicemen and women before
they told you they simply they didn't have enough helicopters. To
blame it on Taliban tactics, I think, frankly, is misleading. We didn't
have enough helicopters. We needed more helicopters. We should
have had helicopters. If the government hadn't cut the helicopter
programme back in 2004, we probably would have had more
helicopters.
GORDON BROWN: This is not correct. The Taliban changed their tactics. We brought in
helicopters from Iraq. We had to reprocess them because they were
not suitable for the terrain in Afghanistan. We've got Chinooks in,
we've got Merlins in, we've got Lynx in, all the helicopters we need
have been put into Afghanistan. I would say with the Chief of
Defence Staff, who said himself we are the best equipped armed
forces in our history as a result of the action we've taken. I'm not
complacent. I want to do more, but we put the helicopters in, we put
the vehicles in, and we're giving our troops the equipment they
need. I'm very proud of our troops.
ALASTAIR STEWART: Thank you very much indeed. Again, I'm going to draw the line at
that point, but thank you all very much indeed. We're going to move
on to take another question now. Again, viewers in Northern Ireland
will be able to see a debate between the leaders of the Ulster
Unionist Party, the Democratic Unionists, Sinn Fein and the SDLP
next Thursday at 9 o'clock on UTV. Our next question is on health,
an area covered by devolution settlements in Scotland and Wales
and Northern Ireland. To put it, we have Sindhu Navel, who's been
a hospital nurse for 12 years. Mrs Navel.
AUDIENCE MEMBER: My question is, what are the parties' visions for the future of
healthcare in Britain? In particular, how would they address the cost
pressures arising from an ageing population and more expensive
new treatments?
ALASTAIR STEWART: Thank you very much indeed. Mr Brown?
GORDON BROWN: To help people live at home, to give them the urgent care needs
they have and see them met, for example, by home helps and
health visitors, so that people who want to stay at home don't have
to go into institutional care. We've seen a revolution. Large numbers
of people are living longer, which is a great thing, but people need
help in their homes so that they don't have to go into nursing homes
or old people's homes. My priorities for the health service are that
we give people personal guarantees that every individual patient will
know they will get a cancer specialist seen within two weeks if need
it. They'll get a diagnostic test within one week, and the results to
them. They will also be able to know that their operation will be in 18
weeks if you're any patient in need of an operation. You'll be able to
see a GP in the evenings and weekends, something which wasn't
happening. You'll be able to get a free health check-up on the
National Health Service. I want people to know that public services
are personal to people's needs, and that's why we need to give
these guarantees to individual patients, and that's what we're going
to do from now on.
DAVID CAMERON: First of all, can I thank you for your incredible service to the NHS. I
think the NHS is a wonderful, wonderful thing. What it did for my
family and for my son, I will never forget. I went from hospital to
hospital, A&Es in the middle of the night, sleeping in different wards
in different places. The dedication, and the vocation and the love
you get from people who work in the NHS just, I think, makes me
incredibly proud of this country, so thank you for all that you've
done. I think it is special, the NHS, and we made a special
exception of the NHS and said yes, there are going to have to be
difficult financial decisions elsewhere, but we think that the NHS
budget should grow in real terms, i.e., more than inflation, every
year under a Conservative government. My vision is that we
improve it, we expand it, we develop it, we make sure that it's got
more choice and more control for the patient. But we need to do
some short-term things too, like make cancer drugs available to
people to people who need them. There are some tragic cases now
of people not getting what they need.
NICK CLEGG: Of course, the easy thing is to say how much we all love and
depend and rely on the NHS. The difficult question, which I think is
the one you're addressing, is, how do we protect the NHS which we
all rely on, maternity services, A&E departments, GP services and
so on, when money is tight? I think it's a bit like the earlier
discussion about equipment for the army. The priorities at the
moment are all wrong. The last year under this government, they've
employed 5,000 more managers in the NHS, yet the maternity ward
in the NHS hospital where my third son was born just over a year
ago is threatened with closure. This government spent £12 billion on
a computer testimony in the NHS which doesn't work, yet I was in
Burnley the other day, I think Jacqueline was saying you come from
Burnley. As you know, they've closed the A&E department there. I
think you now have to travel 25 miles to Blackburn. What is going
on? We're closing A&E departments and maternity wards and
wasting money on computer systems and bureaucracy. I want to
turn that on its head so we can protect the NHS we all rely on.
GORDON BROWN: I've got to say that my equipment to the NHS is that we will give
people these personal guarantees: the main source of employment
in the NHS is more nurses. We've got 80,000 to 90,000 more
nurses across the United Kingdom. We've got 30,000 more doctors.
We've got the best equipment now in some of our hospitals.
Remember the situation before 1997, when people had to wait two
years for operations? It's now a maximum of 18 weeks. Yes, it is our
priority that we will support the frontline services, health, the
National Health Service, education and policing. These are the
frontline services that people depend on. We will make sure that
that finance is there. David says he will support the National Health
Service, which assumes he will not give the same guarantees to
education and policing as I asked him earlier this evening. The main
point to recognise is this: David will not give you the guarantee that
you'll see a cancer specialist in two weeks, or the guarantee that
you'll have a GP in the evenings and weekends. These are personal
guarantees written into the NHS constitution that we will give.
DAVID CAMERON: The point is that today, actually, the number of nurses is going up -
the number of managers is going up five times faster than the
number of nurses in our NHS. The government has had 13 years to
fix these problems, and it hasn't done. Gordon Brown talks about
cancer, but what he's not telling you is that there are people in our
country, there was a case the other day of someone who had to sell
their home to get the cancer drugs. And the Prime Minister, the
government, is about to hit the NHS, Britain's biggest employer, with
this National Insurance rise. It's going to take £200 million out of our
National Health Service. We say stop that National Insurance rise,
and instead spend the money on a cancer drugs fund, so people
can get the drugs they need. Talk about guarantees, but the fact is
for some people, waiting two weeks to see a consultant is too long.
We need a faster, choice-driven system, but the drugs have got to
be there when you need them. They're not always right now.
NICK CLEGG: This is a phoney debate. This is pretending that somehow there are
billions and squillions of pounds around that we can continue to
pour into our NHS. Every man, woman and child in this country
spends £2,000 on the NHS through our tax system. I want to judge
the NHS about how it helps me and my family when we're ill, sick
and in need of NHS care, not just by numbers plucked out of thin
air. David Cameron, you simply cannot seriously suggest that we
should believe that you can cut the deficit immediately as you want,
then have a whole blizzard of tax breaks, including a great big tax
break for double millionaires in the inheritance tax system, and
provide huge lashings of extra money to the public services. You
might be able to do one of those things. You can't do all three. I
want to say to people, let's be straight with you. We have to find
savings in the NHS. I want to see strategic health authorities, which
is a layer of bureaucracy, stripped away altogether and use that
money on the frontline NHS services which are so important to us.
DAVID CAMERON: The point is, we have made a special exception for the NHS for
exactly the reason that Mrs Neville gives, which is that there are
more older people. There are more expensive treatments. There are
drugs budgets that are going up, and we say you need that extra
money to even keep going with the NHS. That's why we make the
exception of the NHS and say that's the budget that has to go up.
What Gordon Brown is not telling you about the situation with
cancer, cancer drugs and cancer outcomes is, after all the things
he's talked about, all the money that's gone in, our death rate from
cancer is actually worse than Bulgaria's. So all that's happened has
not actually improved the outcome, which is what matters.
ALASTAIR STEWART: Gordon Brown?
GORDON BROWN: If people get early detection, and that means screening, I had a lady
write to me who said that she would not be alive today if we hadn't
introduced screening and we hadn't given the chance to see a
specialist in two weeks. What David is not telling you is that while
we're using the National Insurance to pay for health, policing and
schools, he won't give the guarantee on policing in schools...
ALASTAIR STEWART: Mr Brown, thank you. Mr Cameron?
DAVID CAMERON: The National Insurance increase which Gordon Brown has said is
definitely coming in, that will take £200 million out of the NHS. He's
not replacing that money, so he would have less to spend on cancer
drugs. I have a man in my constituency called Clive Stone who had
kidney cancer who came to see me with seven others. Tragically,
two of them have died because they couldn't get the drug Sutent
that they wanted, that was on the market, that people knew was a
good drug. That's a scandal in our country today. So stop the
National Insurance rise, use that money for the cancer drugs and
help people, so our outcomes can be amongst the best in Europe
rather than sadly amongst some of the worst.
NICK CLEGG: All I would appeal for is just a bit of honesty in this debate. People
know that money is tight. People know that you can't promise
something for nothing. You can't say you're going to fill the deficit
tomorrow and you're going to give lots and lots of tax breaks to
people, inheritance tax breaks for double millionaires, tax breaks for
one in three hand-picked married couples, and also extra, extra
money to the NHS without explaining how you're going to do it.
ALASTAIR STEWART: Mr Cameron?
NICK CLEGG: I say again there's something wrong...
ALASTAIR STEWART: Mr Cameron? Thank you, Mr Clegg.
DAVID CAMERON: Nick Clegg is promising a £17 billion tax cut. We're saying, stop the
waste of £6 billion to stop the National Insurance rise. I would love
to take everyone out of their first £10,000 of income tax, Nick. It's a
beautiful idea, a lovely idea. We cannot afford it.
NICK CLEGG: Shall I tell you how we pay for it?
ALASTAIR STEWART: Please do! Mr Clegg?
NICK CLEGG: I'll tell you how we pay for it. We would, for instance, stop the huge
unfair loopholes that only benefit the very wealthy at the top of the
tax system. At the moment, the top 10% of earners in this country
get twice as much tax subsidy from all the rest of you when they
make contributions to their pension pot than everybody else. We
say give everybody tax relief on their pension contributions but
make sure they're the same. And use that money...
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Gordon Brown.
NICK CLEGG: ..so no-one pays any income tax on the first £10,000 they earn.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Thank you. Mr Brown.
GORDON BROWN:
Where Nick and I are agreed is that to give an inheritance tax cut to
the 3,000 richest estates in the country, of £200,000 each, the
biggest manifesto promise that the Conservatives made, is totally
unfair to the rest of the population of this country. I say to him, we
will use the National Insurance to pay for health care, to pay for
policing, and to pay for schools. He will not be able to do that, and
he's got to tell us the truth about how he will pay for his policies.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
I'm going to stop you. I'm going to stop you there, partly because of
time, also because, thank you, Mr Brown, people have heard that
particular exchange as well. I have time to get one more question in.
That's why I interrupted at that point. I'm grateful for you accepting
it. Now, in what will be, as I've just told thm, our final question of this
evening, it's also a policy area that's devolved in Scotland, Wales
and Northern Ireland. Alan Shaw is a train driver from Accrington.
Your question, sir.
AUDIENCE MEMBER: Thank you, Alastair. Gentlemen. When are each individual party
going to introduce a fairer system to care for the elderly when it is
required, especially those who have worked and contributed
towards the country's economy, without the need for them to sell
and dispose of their assets? And what are your policies?
DAVID CAMERON:
Thank you, Alan, for asking this question. I think it's an absolutely
vital question. I think it's so unfair that today you can have people
who have worked hard all their lives, they've saved, they've paid
down the mortgage, they've done all the right things, and yet if they
go into residential care, they have to spend every penny of that
money. And maybe the neighbour who didn't work hard, didn't save,
and went about things in a different way, they get the whole thing
paid for for free. I think that's just not fair. So we have... As we
know, there is a huge budget deficit, a great big hole left by Gordon
Brown, so we can't make all care free, I don't think we can afford
that. What we can do is say to people, if you put aside £8,000 on
turning 65, we can guarantee that you won't have to pay for
residential care. That would remove the need to sell your home to
pay for care. It would mean you could pass your home on to your
children rather than have to pay for your care bills. It doesn't solve
the whole problem, but I think it'd be a good start, a fair start, in
rewarding the people who have done the right thing.
NICK CLEGG:
I think, Alan, this is one of those rare issues where the issue is so
big, and the costs are potentially so great, and it affects every
family, it affects every individual, that I think this is one of those
issues where I would say, it is worth the politicians setting aside
their political differences for once and trying to come up with a
solution everybody can agree with. We've all got different ideas. We
have ideas, proposals, that there's a contribution from the individual
and the state. David Cameron's ideas, which helps some but
doesn't help people in their home. Gordon Brown has some ideas
which help some of the most needy, but not others. Why don't we
for once, given this is something which I think is bigger than any
other party, actually work together? There are some things,
however, that I think we can do immediately. I, for instance, would
like to use the money that the government has allocated for its
latest, I think slightly flawed, proposals, to give respite care to the
carers who look after loved ones, those who looked after loved ones
for the greatest amount of time, give them respite for at least a week
every year. That's something we can do now. Let's come up with a
longer term proposal together.
GORDON BROWN:
Elderly people should not have to choose between the home they
own and the care they need. We have to devise a better system for
the future. That's why the first stage of it is urgent-needs care. So
you can stay in your own home, you don't have to go into a nursing
home, you get the support you need to stay in your own home free
of charge. We're introducing that from April next year. The second
stage in the next parliament is to say to people, if you're in an old
people's home and you're in that home for more than two years, it
will be free for personal and medical care from then onwards. That
will take away the worry and anxiety people feel that their own home
will have to be sold to meet the costs of residential care. The third
stage will be to move to a more comprehensive system where
people can be guaranteed that their needs will be met in the long
run. I agree with Nick, we want consensus on this, we want to
proceed in a way that every party, that every part of the country is
with us. That's why we are consulting the social care groups, setting
up a new commission to look at the finding for the future after the
next parliament, but we're committed to urgent needs being met
now.
DAVID CAMERON
It isn't a small problem about people having to sell their homes to
pay for care. I believe it's 45,000 families every year who have to do
that. As I say, I think there's a deep unfairness in the system.
DAVID CAMERON:
Look, all of us, when we we get older, want to spend as long as
possible at home before going into residential care. Anything we can
do to help people adapt their homes and live in their homes, and
also to help the carers, if carers stopped caring in Britain, whether
for disabled children or elderly people, if they packed up and gave
up, that would cost us £50 billion as well as the hurt and pain it
would cause. So giving carers clearer rights and saying if you care
for someone, you should get a break. The thing every carer says to
me more than anything else is, "Give me a break every now and
again, and I can go on doing what I do". I hope as we try and seek
some consensus, let's put the carer absolutely up front and centre.
They're Britain's unsung heroes.
NICK CLEGG:
Of course, I agree with that. There are about a million carers in this
country who care, I think, for 50 hours or more for their loved ones,
for members of their family who need care. They are the unsung
army of heroines and heroes that keep our society together. They
desperately need time for themselves, time to go on holiday. Under
our plans, what we could do immediately is give those million carers
who care for the greatest length of time at least a week off - at least
a week off - just to have a breather, spend some time on their own,
visit friends, go on holiday, have some time to themselves again.
But as I say, I think we've all got some ideas, but I don't think any of
us - and you don't hear this from politicians very much - I don't think
any of us, if we're really honest with you, have got the perfect
solution. That's why I think this is so important. Let's for once put
people before politics and come up with a solution that works for
you and your family in the long run.
GORDON BROWN:
We have tried to do something about respite care. There are six
million carers in this country. I've met many of them and talked to
them about their needs. One need is respite, so that they can have
a break, as Nick said. We're introducing, and have actually made
provision, for more measures for respite care. But the questioner
was asking about, also, how he could be sure that he could be less
worried about having to go into an old people's home, or what would
happen if he got ill later on in his life. That's why the urgent-needs
measure we're introducing from April next year is so important. It
means that you can stay in your own home, have the help that is
available, the equipment, but also the home helps and the health
visitors, and at the moment, it is being means-tested. Now, in future,
it will be free of charge.
DAVID CAMERON:
I think one of the biggest things we must do is, I think it's right to try
and forge a consensus, because this is a long-term issue we must
deal with, is to try and give the carer and those they care for more
power and control and influence over their lives. Form an individual
budget for each one. Make sure that if they want to, they can take
that as a direct payment, they can make decisions about the sort of
respite they need. We tried to do this with my son, and when you try
and get a direct payment system so you're in charge of the money
and you can try and get some help, it's unbelievably complicated.
You've got so set up a separate bank account, you've got to read
about four lever-arch files. I found it testing enough. What someone
who's recently had to start caring, who's under huge pressure,
maybe getting ill of what they're doing, to try and get direct
payments, let's make it easier. We ought to be trusting people to do
this.
GORDON BROWN:
I think the key is, of course, urgent-needs payments for people so
that they are sure they can stay in their own home. I agree that we
need to do more for carers. I want carers to be able to manage their
own budgets as well, and that's something we're really working on
for the future as well. But we've got to find a solution to this big
problem. The big problem is, people don't want to have to make the
choice between owning their home and getting the care they need.
That's why in the next parliament, it's important to try with the
commission to reach a consensus on what the funding will be for the
future.
NICK CLEGG:
I think everybody will be surprised that the last question of the
evening should actually have flowed into so much consensus. I think
it is one of those issues, a bit like public sector pensions. I also think
the scale of the public sector deficit is one of those issues where I
think if we could introduce a new kind of politics in this country, not
the old style of politics, we could actually come up with a solution
that everybody could agree to, because I think you and your family
would benefit from it so much.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
Gentlemen, it will disappoint you and many people, but we've come
to the end of our debating time. If I can just explain to you, while you
mull over what you've heard already, what happens now is that
each of them will have one and a half minutes to make their closing
statement. The evening began with an opener. You've heard lots of
cut-and-thrust about a number of issues, but now each of them has
one and a half minutes to attempt to persuade you of their overall
position. Mr Clegg, you first.
NICK CLEGG:
Well, thanks for starters, for sticking with us for a full 90 minutes.
What I've tried to show you this evening is that there is an
alternative to the two old parties. I know many of you think that all
politicians are just the same. I hope I've tried to show you that that
just isn't true. Whether it is on the questions from Alan on care,
Jacqueline on crime, Helen on politics, Joel on schooling, Robert on
the deficit, I believe we can answer all of those questions. I believe
we can rise to all of those challenges if we say no to the old parties
and yes to something new and something different. That's what I
offer and that's what the Liberal Democrats offer. So don't let them
tell you that the only choice is between two old parties who have
been playing pass the parcel with your government for 65 years now
- making the same promises, breaking the same promises. Making
the same old mistakes over and over again. I think, despite all the
challenges, all the problems we have, I think we can be really
hopeful about the future. I genuinely believe we can have a better
fairer country if we do things differently. So give real change a
chance. Trust your instincts. Support fairness. Choose something
different. And that will give you and your family a better, fairer life.
Thank you.
GORDON BROWN:
You know it's been a great opportunity to exchange ideas this
evening. I know we're not up against The X Factor or Britain's Got
Talent and I hope people have been able to stay with us in the
exchange that we've had about the future policies of this country. I
was really struck with a number of questions, but particularly the
one from Robert about the future of his healthcare trust and about
the jobs that may be at risk. I've got to come to this central problem
that we've got at the moment: we've got to make a decision now
about how we secure the recovery this year. We've got to make a
decision about whether we put funds into the economy or take funds
out of the economy. Now, I'm very clear we mustn't make the
mistakes of the 1930s or the 1980s when unemployment rose for
five years after the official end of the recession. So we've got to
make sure the money is in the economy this year so that the
recovery is secure. And then we've got to make sure that as we cut
the deficit, we are fair to our National Health Service, our policing,
and fair to our schools. And that's why the National Insurance rise
is necessary, to protect our health service, our schools and our
police. I think it was very interesting when David Cameron was
asked, he couldn't give a guarantee that we are giving about the
funding on schools, he couldn't give a guarantee about the funding
on policing. And when it came to the National Health Service, he
couldn't give the same personal guarantees that we're giving about
cancer specialist care, about seeing a GP at the evenings and
weekends. Now these are problems he's got to address in the
future. I look forward to the next debate so we can get all the issues
raised, aired about the future of our country.
ALASTAIR STEWART:
David Cameron.
DAVID CAMERON:
Well I think it has been a great opportunity to have this debate. And
I think one of the things I've heard during this debate is just
repeated attempts to try and frighten you about a Conservative
government. And I would say, choose hope over fear, because we
have incredibly exciting and optimistic plans for the future of our
country. A great vision where we build a bigger society, where we
get our economy moving, where we stop Labour's jobs tax which
could destroy that economy. I think it's been shown tonight the idea
you have to go on wasting money to secure the recovery is simply
wrong. You heard a lot about policy tonight. But I think as important
as policy is your values. Let me tell you mine. If you work hard, I'll
be behind you; if you want to raise a family, I will support you. If
you're old and you become ill, we will always be there for you. This
is an amazing country. We've done incredible things. I think we can
go on and do even more incredible things but we need two things: a
government with the right values and also an understanding that
we're all in this together and real change comes when we come
together and work together. That's the sort of the change and that's
the sort of leadership that I would bring to our great country.
ALASTAIR STEWART: Gentlemen, thank you very much indeed for your contributions to
this, our first debate. Can I turn to you as well, all of you here with
us this evening. Thank you particularly to those who asked the
questions, and also a heartfelt thanks to those who submitted
brilliant questions but for which we did not have time. Thank you so
much. Our thanks then to Nick Clegg, to Gordon Brown, and to
David Cameron. Stay with us now on ITV1 for instant reaction and
analysis of the debate on News At Ten. Including the results of the
first opinion poll on who came out on top tonight. At the end of an
historic moment in television and political history, a very good night
to you. Good night. APPLAUSE.
(sura: http://go2.wordpress.com/?id=725X1342&site=mihaivoicu.wordpress.com&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.bbc.co.uk%2F2%2Fshared%2Fbsp%2Fhi%2Fpdfs%2F16_04_10_firstdebate.pdf&sref=http%3A%2F%2Fmihaivoicu.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F04%2F18%2Fmai-multe-amestecate-dar-nu-de-la-noi%2F)
© Gheorghe Florescu, 2008 Acest site este un pamflet politic şi, uneori, cultural, trebuie deci tratat ca atare.
8 comments:
Biblio,
După cum văd, încă mai trageţi nădejde...
Este adevărat, mai am mici speranţe...
Domnia voastră la care dintre ele vă referiţi?
Buna seara dle Gheorghe Florescu, imi cer scuze ca intervin "hors sujet" dar mai sunt 4 zile de campanie in C19 si sunt foarte dornic sa fie dezbatuta propunerea mea legislativa + atitudinea lui TEO! http://cristianpreda.ro/2010/04/19/sesiune-fara-voturi/comment-page-1/#comment-25971
mersi anticipat pentru orice comentariu din partea dvs.!
Văd că încă nu a fost moderat comentariul la care daţi link.
Biblio,
Referitor la speranţe, eu mă gândeam că aşa, în general, de exemplu că demagogii noştri ar trebui să fie mai puţin demagogi decât ai lor, câtă vreme între noi şi Imperiu e oarece diferenţă. După cum vedeţi eu nici buna-credinţă a exemplului n-am încredere... Recent am urmărit un scurt speech al lui Gordon Brown şi m-am îngrozit...
@ nimrod
Adevărata problemă, generalizată în întreaga lume, este că politica de astăzi, politicianul de astăzi, nu mai are nici o legătură cu politica şi politicianul de acum 100 sau 150 de ani. Rolul politicii şi al politicianului s-a denaturat pe măsură ce timpul trece, până ce omenirea a ajuns să trăiască un nou tip de feudalism.
Când conducerea statală politică (ca ştiinţă a guvernării) a fost introdusă, politica înseamna raţiune. Astăzi politica înseamnă interes, minciună şi înşelăciune.
Politica de astăzi nu mai are nimic de-a face cu ştiinţa proiectării, cu principiile, cu sistemele instituţionale, ea contorsionează sistemele existente astfel încât să arate bine, fără a avea însă o substanţă reală.
Priviţi acest CLIP. Este sugestiv.
Speranţa mea nu este că politicienii de astăzi se vor schimba. Eu sper că politicienii de astăzi vor ajunge într-un punct de minim şi vor dispărea, ca tipologie, din istorie lăsând loc unei normalităţi. Avem nevoie despre politica elitelor. Eu la asta sper.
În realitate politica Românească arată cam aşa.
Evident, mult mai violent.
:)
Post a Comment